Powered by Max Banner Ads 

The Irvine Council Majority Just Hates the Irvine Community News & Views


This post is about two weeks in the making.  A week before Thanksgiving, my daughter was craving the fantastic Tomato/Basil soup and sandwich meal served up by our neighborhood Champange’s Bakery and Bistro.  My wife and I were both wiped out from a hard day, so take out sounded like a great idea.  I called ahead for four orders and left to go pick it up.

The restaurant was about 40 minutes from closing and there were a handful of customers lingering.  I paid and wait for my order.  I noticed copies of the Irvine Community News & Views on the counter and picked one up.  I looked over at the manager and said “Thanks for carrying this newspaper.  You know, one of our city council members hates this paper (I didn’t name Christina Shea, but spoiler alert if you couldn’t guess who; she had routinely contacted businesses urging them not to carry the paper calling it a slate mailer even though there’s no slate to promote).

The manager said, “Our customers like it.”

Another young man from behind the counter then chimed in and said he had taken a call from a man claiming to represent the Mayor’s office asking them to stop carrying the paper.  I asked him if he could remember who called him exactly.  He said he didn’t but the caller was a man who said he was from the mayor’s office.  The man asked the clerk if they would stop carrying the paper.  The clerk said the call came during business hours.

At no point during this interaction did I introduce myself or tell the staff I’m associated with TheLiberalOC.  I did hold the paper up to the manager and said this is a real newspaper.  It has stories.  It has a community calendar.  It has pictures.  It carriers advertisements.  Thanks for carrying the paper; if you were to stop, I’d take my business elsewhere.

I contacted Irvine City Hall and described my interaction with the Bakery staff.

The city got back to me a few days later with this collection of notes from Mayor Steven Choi’s staff:

From aide Janet Colclaser: It wasn’t me-& I have never been there, period.
From aide Sara Yi: Mayor Choi,  

I do not have any knowledge of the matter, and I certainly never made a phone call to Champagne’s Bakery and Bistro before.   

The only male council executive assistant is Sung, and I can confidently say that the Sung that I know would have never made such calls. I see no problem of Champagne Bakery carrying Irvine Community News & Views in the first place anyways.  

Thinking up to this point, I would like to carefully suggest the possibility of someone else (that we do not know of) claiming to be your assistant (when they are not), and making such a phone call to the bakery.  


From aide Sungwoo Hong:

Dear all,

I didn’t do it, and I have no idea about this at all. Period.



The denials are not surprising.  I wouldn’t think that any member of the mayor’s staff would admit to making a call on the taxpayer’s dime, but it doesn’t mean it didn’t happen.  Since Christina Shea has been very proactive, perhaps it was someone from her team.

When I ordered my Thanksgiving rolls, I called and spoke with the clerk I had the conversation with the previous week.  After placing my order, I told him who I was.  I asked if he was sure the call came from someone who said they represent the Mayor’s office.  I told him I was writing a post (he asked not to be identified). He reiterated the caller was a man who said he was from the Mayor’s office but couldn’t remember the name.

So at this point, dear reader, we need to decide who’s being truthful here?  I know who I believe, but I’ll consider the notion that someone from city hall is calling on businesses to stop a newspaper from being distributed and read in the city, it just might not be the mayor’s office.  Or perhaps it is and someone isn’t telling the truth.  We make no accusations here other than relay that the Republicans who sit on the council majority are in fact blocking the distribution of the Irvine Community News & Views from the publication racks at city hall in apparent violation of the city’s Free Speech Ordinance.

  1. Its not a slate mailer if there is no slate to promote.
  2. In America, anyone with a printing press can publish a newspaper.
  3. The Irvine Community News & Views has perhaps the city’s best community calendar; it runs articles with bylines, photos, high school sports news and carries advertising.
  4. The censorship by the Council Majority to keep this publication out of city hall and efforts by Council member Christina Shea to encourage businesses to stop carrying the paper amount to First Amendment violations by government inhibiting freedom of the press and freedom of speech.

Champagne’s has no political allegiance to either party and their excellent breakfasts and lunches are about as non-partisan as you can get.

The question remains, who do you believe here?

  14 comments for “The Irvine Council Majority Just Hates the Irvine Community News & Views

  1. Ltpar
    November 30, 2015 at 9:53 am

    Dan, I see you are still spreading the propaganda that your trash political sheet is a legitimate newspaper. A slate mailer can deal with more than individual candidates and in the case of the Irvine News, it still promotes the Agranista agenda, which voters basically have discarded. That said, I do not believe the Council should be wasting time suggesting business owners not have it in their establishments. They are all adults and should be able to run their business as they see fit, without political interference. If they choose to promote a political propaganda piece, let their customers be the judge of whether they want to do business there or not. As far as who to believe, I failed to notice any direct quote by Steven Choi in you commentary. I am assuming that you didn’t front him on the issue. I would be interested in his response, as opposed to his paid underlings.

  2. November 30, 2015 at 3:19 pm

    Pat, we held this post at his request. His aides denied involvement. The bigger question is who do you believe?

    • Ltpar
      December 1, 2015 at 12:17 am

      I believe the Mayor and his staff. I found out who made the call and it was a private citizen with no affiliation to the Mayor or the City. The person did not identify themself as a staff member. Your server was wrong.

      • December 1, 2015 at 3:39 pm

        Oh Pat, but the person SAID he represented the Mayor’s office. Who was it? Out Out with it. The server got it right. He heard someone say they represented the mayor….your source is the liar. Who is it?

  3. junior
    December 1, 2015 at 7:38 am

    Why do some want to classify the paper as a “slate mailer”? I am not clear on that point.

    • Ltpar
      December 1, 2015 at 7:03 pm

      Because it does not objectively cover community news. It is 100% biased promoting the Larry Agran agenda and his associates. I expect to see the zombie version of Larry Agran rear his head, attempting a comeback with a new slate of clones in 2016.

      • junior
        December 2, 2015 at 9:16 am

        So why all the moaning & groaning about a biased news journal – that’s politics – that’s life – get over it.

  4. junior
    December 2, 2015 at 9:18 am

    The solution to biased free speech is more free speech – get your own biased news journal.

    • Ltpar
      December 2, 2015 at 10:05 am

      Issue is not free speech. The issue is some uninformed people mistakenly believe that the propaganda rag is a legitimate community newspaper and it is not. The Agranistas are merely trying to stay in the limelight, hold the line and hope the voters of Irvine will overlook their past transgressions in the next election.

      • Dan Chmielewski
        December 2, 2015 at 10:30 am

        Pat, read the First Amendment; the council majority is censoring this newspaper. This is America. Anyone with a printing press can publish a newspaper. Why are you against freedom?

      • junior
        December 2, 2015 at 11:15 am

        The issue is most definitely free speech – and “caveat emptor.”

        Start your own biased news journal Pat – stop whining where free speech is concerned.

        • Ltpar
          December 3, 2015 at 7:09 pm

          I could give a rats ass about the Community News and Views because I throw it in the trash. I have no problem with it being distributed, just call it what it is and stop trying to fool people who believe it is a legitimate newspaper.

          Dan, I am probably more familiar with “Freedom” than you ever will be. I spent most of my adult life defending it from my days in the Marine Corps, 35 years as a Cop, to representing our country in both Afghanistan and Iraq after I retired. Unless I miss my guess and I hope I do, the days of fighting for freedom in America are not over. Semper Fidelis.

  5. December 4, 2015 at 12:24 pm

    The Ancient Wanker (“junior”) is right on this.

  6. Judy
    December 8, 2015 at 4:15 pm

    I’m a liberal democrat, probably agree with much of what is in the News and Views, but can still tell it’s propaganda. It’s not a newspaper.

    I have a hunch this “newspaper” and Agran’s “slow growth” team started the rumor that the Woodbridge Village Association would be converted into condos. And of course, people who have no idea as to how these things work believe it, and spread the message via social media. It’s very smart, I don’t deny you that!

Comments are closed.