Van Tran: A True Divider with a little hate thrown in for good measure

Assemblyman Van Tran

Van Tran in a post-debate interview told me that he was not a divider like Loretta. Just so we can put that lie to bed, here is some evidence from one of his mailers that runs counter to his claim.

From Van Tran Mailer

In this mailer, Tran clearly attacks the fears and bigotry that he haas promoted in the Vietnames community against the LGBT community. The photo is of Bob Tucker, candidate for Garden Grove School Board and his partner Quan. Here is what Bob wrote in their email to me about the mailer.

Above the article there is the quote from the Vietnamese priest who called gays “mentally deficient and inhuman” regarding the gay contingent in the Tet parade, which the picture is from. The sign we are holding says “19 years together, how about you?”

Below the picture it states that Sanchez always supports gay rights and is anti Prop 8.

In a way I’m glad the photo still has life after the Tet parade,
especially with the message of the sign we carried that day.


Van Tran is a DIVIDER. Any questions?

  3 comments for “Van Tran: A True Divider with a little hate thrown in for good measure

  1. November 1, 2010 at 12:33 pm

    Van Tran stood by and said nothing when John McCain referred to Vietnamese as “gooks.” He worked for Bob Dornan and said nothing when Dornan used the words “lesbian spearchucker” in a sentence. And he has the stones to accuse Sanchez of racebaiting? Hypocrite. (and no, I won’t apologize for that)

  2. Rueben V.
    November 2, 2010 at 12:25 am

    This Is CECIS night tonight she will make history and secure her nomination by winning 65,000 votes, than she will take the democratic nomination for congress, the OC liberal will validate her and beg to have an interviewawith her, I hope your ready to eat your words Dan and Chris and the rest of the staff of the OC Liberalthat has wrongly accused her. GO CECI!!! 🙂

  3. Rainie Nguyen
    November 2, 2010 at 12:22 pm

    Mr. Van Tran is a lawyer beside a assemblyman. He knows the law better than anyone else but he still make himself look even worst. He is the lawyer but did not obey it. How people could believe him as a good assemblyman.

Comments are closed.