<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Team Hutchens Gets All Puffed Up</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/</link>
	<description>Challenging Orange County&#039;s right-wing noise machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jul 2010 00:30:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ltpar</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/comment-page-1/#comment-49699</link>
		<dc:creator>Ltpar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 20:21:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/?p=12781#comment-49699</guid>
		<description>Not being familiar with the OCEA MOU with the Sheriff&#039;s Department, or the Personnel Rules of the County of Orange, I can  only surmise that they are similar to what other Public Agencies use.  As a general rule, sick absences for a few days require no justification from anyone.  A person could be sick with the flu, be in bed and off work for two or three days and not go to the doctor.  You don&#039;t want such employees at work, infecting others.  For more extended sick absences, a doctor&#039;s visit or release might be required.  Even then, if the employee has a good work history, that rule might not be enforced.  If an agency doesn&#039;t enforce a rule or regulation consistently, it is the same as not having it at all.  I would guess the response by the Under Sheriff could well be a knee jerk bluff, trying to head off a potential absence problem.  I agree, it was not well thought out and not a good move by the Sheriff&#039;s Department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not being familiar with the OCEA MOU with the Sheriff&#8217;s Department, or the Personnel Rules of the County of Orange, I can  only surmise that they are similar to what other Public Agencies use.  As a general rule, sick absences for a few days require no justification from anyone.  A person could be sick with the flu, be in bed and off work for two or three days and not go to the doctor.  You don&#8217;t want such employees at work, infecting others.  For more extended sick absences, a doctor&#8217;s visit or release might be required.  Even then, if the employee has a good work history, that rule might not be enforced.  If an agency doesn&#8217;t enforce a rule or regulation consistently, it is the same as not having it at all.  I would guess the response by the Under Sheriff could well be a knee jerk bluff, trying to head off a potential absence problem.  I agree, it was not well thought out and not a good move by the Sheriff&#8217;s Department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anyon</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/comment-page-1/#comment-49636</link>
		<dc:creator>Anyon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 21:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/?p=12781#comment-49636</guid>
		<description>Just curious: How many OCEA employees are there at OCSD? Are we talking about lay off of 5% or a layoff of 50% because it would make a big difference. The only thing I&#039;ve seen reported is the total number of layoffs which looks big but might not be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just curious: How many OCEA employees are there at OCSD? Are we talking about lay off of 5% or a layoff of 50% because it would make a big difference. The only thing I&#8217;ve seen reported is the total number of layoffs which looks big but might not be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: OCMom</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/comment-page-1/#comment-49633</link>
		<dc:creator>OCMom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 20:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/?p=12781#comment-49633</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t understand the knee-jerk reaction by Under Sheriff John Scott.  OCEA is talking about talking to the OCEA Sheriff&#039;s Agency employees.  That&#039;s all.  Now the people who are legitimately sick with the flu or migraine or whatever has to haul themselves to the doctor to get a note instead of staying in bed and getting better.  What a bonehead move.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t understand the knee-jerk reaction by Under Sheriff John Scott.  OCEA is talking about talking to the OCEA Sheriff&#8217;s Agency employees.  That&#8217;s all.  Now the people who are legitimately sick with the flu or migraine or whatever has to haul themselves to the doctor to get a note instead of staying in bed and getting better.  What a bonehead move.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Claudio Gallegos</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2010/01/07/team-hutchens-gets-all-puffed-up/comment-page-1/#comment-49625</link>
		<dc:creator>Claudio Gallegos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/?p=12781#comment-49625</guid>
		<description>Don&#039;t blame me. I wanted them to choose Ralph Martin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Don&#8217;t blame me. I wanted them to choose Ralph Martin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
