Comments on: Separated at Birthers: Art Pedroza and Orly Taitz

By: Fred

Fred — Tue, 08 Dec 2009 13:23:07 +0000

Only one question…, if nobama has a legitimate birth certificate (not a record of birth), why does he even need a lawyer, let alone a herd of them, representing him at the court case on this? If someone challenged me on my birth certificate I’d be more than happy to take them to my city of birth and get an original for them. It makes no sense.

By: Dan Chmielewski

Dan Chmielewski — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 16:27:21 +0000

Art — if you want to see a nutter, look in a mirror. Unbelievable.

“Did she encourage Sue to run against Lou? Who knows. I surely don’t take Lorri at her word.”

Thanks for again proving the point of my post Art.

By: junior

junior — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:23:36 +0000

Pedroza has more in common with Drake:

When speaking of the possibility that Mayor Pulido would be appointed as Ambassador to Mexico Art Pedroza said:
“… it is likely that at some point he (Pulido) will be kidnapped or whacked while serving in Mexico. Perfect! We will be rid of him in Santa Ana, and he will be taken care of by criminals in Mexico. It doesn’t get any better than that.”

By: Art Pedroza

Art Pedroza — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 07:07:49 +0000

Dan,

Actually, I work in the field a lot. But I do spend time at my home office too. Not usually in slippers though.

As for this Orly character, isn’t she a nutter? And aren’t Sue and Ed Perez nutters? I don’t hang out with people like that, but apparently your pal Lorri does. She appointed Ed to the Anaheim Planning Commission, and he appears in a YouTube video praising her.

Did she encourage Sue to run against Lou? Who knows. I surely don’t take Lorri at her word. She has had a beef with Lou Correa for some time. Even if she did not encourage Sue to run, she must be loving it.

Sue of course has no chance of beating Lou, but Lorri should get off her a** and endorse Lou already. That would clear things up more than your shilling for her.

By: Dan Chmielewski

Dan Chmielewski — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 04:04:29 +0000

Actually, Lorri’s statement is evidence. Produce evidence to the contrary, because it becomes a situation of do you believe what Lorri said or what Art thinks? I wold think even Lorri’s detractors here would agree she carries more believability than Pedroza.

On the second part, you got me. I just hope he’s dressed while working, not to belittle people who work naked, like strippers and hookers.

By: Anyon

Anyon — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:10:59 +0000

Dan,

I agree with you that Art is as batty as Orly. But hvae issues with two points.

First, as someone else mentioned, Lorri’s statement is not evidence. The problem is that you are trying to prove a negative (that Lorri didn’t do something) and that is pretty much impossible. I know nothing of the situation, but I think Lorri is more credible than Art but that isn’t saying much.

Second, it’s not fair to criticize those who have the good fortune of being able to work in their pajamas and fuzzy slippers. I have doubts about the legitimacy of Art’s “business” but if those doubts were based on what he is able to wear to work, I’d have to doubt the legitimacy of my business.

By: Dan Chmielewski

Dan Chmielewski — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 03:00:15 +0000

is there evidence to the contrary? I spoke to Lorri directly. She didn’t quibble and I don’t think she’s that good an actress. What evidence does Art have that she did play a role?

By: Fruitcake

Fruitcake — Tue, 10 Nov 2009 01:26:23 +0000

A politicians’ denial does not constitute “evidence”. As a blogger, you should know that. Try again.