HT to our friends at MediaMatters.org, an organization that does an outstanding job of fact-checking the right wing.Â
With the president’s to school kids on the importance of staying in school (stuff you heard from yours parents when you were in school and what you tell your kids today) being politicized by the right wing and some districts in the OC denying kids the chance to watch the address live, let’s turn on the Way Back machine to the address sainted dead President Ronald Reagan made to students in 1988.Â Tell me these comments aren’t an attempt to turn impressionable minds to the Right?
See the video hereÂ and read Examiner.com’s Ryan Witt’s commentary on the partisan nature of the speeches given to school kids by both President Reagan and President George H.W. Bush.
Here’s an excerpt of their post:
On November 14, 1988, Reagan addressed and took questions from students from four area middle schools in the Old Executive Office Building. According to press secretary Marlin Fitzwater, the speech was broadcast live and rebroadcast by C-Span, and Instructional Television Network fed the program â€œt o schools nationwide on three different days.â€ Much of Reaganâ€™s speech that day covered the American â€œvision of self-governmentâ€ and the need â€œto keep faith with the unfinished vision of the greatness and wonder of Americaâ€ but in the middle of the speech, the president went off on a tangent about the importance of low taxes:
Today, to a degree never before seen in human history, one nation, the United States, has become the model to be followed and imitated by the rest of the world. But America’s world leadership goes well beyond the tide toward democracy. We also find that more countries than ever before are following America’s revolutionary economic message of free enterprise, low taxes, and open world trade. These days, whenever I see foreign leaders, they tell me about their plans for reducing taxes, and other economic reforms that they are using, copying what we have done here in our country.
I wonder if they realize that this vision of economic freedom, the freedom to work, to create and produce, to own and use property without the interference of the state, was central to the American Revolution, when the American colonists rebelled against a whole web of economic restrictions, taxes and barriers to free trade. The message at the Boston Tea Party — have you studied yet in history about the Boston Tea Party, where because of a tax they went down and dumped the tea in the Harbor. Well, that was America’s original tax revolt, and it was the fruits of our labor — it belonged to us and not to the state. And that truth is fundamental to both liberty and prosperity.
During the Q&A, this question came up:
Q My name is Cam Fitzie and I’m from St. Agnes School in Alexandria, Virginia. I was wondering if you think that it is possible to decrease the national debt without raising the taxes of the public?
PRESIDENT REAGAN: I do. That’s a big argument that’s going on in government and I definitely believe it is because one of the principle reasons that we were able to get the economy back on track and create those new jobs and all was we cut the taxes, we reduced them. Because you see, the taxes can be such a penalty on people that there’s no incentive for them to prosper and to earn more and so forth because they have to give so much to the government. And what we have found is that at the lower rates the government gets more revenue, there are more people paying taxes because there are more people with jobs and there are more people willing to earn more money because they get to keep a bigger share of it, so today, we’re getting more revenue at the lower rates than we were at the higher. And do you know something? I studied economics in college when I was young and I learned there about a man named Ibn Khaldun, who lived 1200 years ago in Egypt. And 1200 years ago he said, in the beginning of the empire, the rates were low, the tax rates were low, but the revenue was great. He said in the end of empire, when the empire was collapsing, the rates were great and the revenue was low.
Our conservative friends usually hail Reagan’s handling of the economy.Â I remember former Senator Lloyd Bentsen’s comment that “if you write a few billion in hot checks” he too could provide an illusion of economic prosperity.
Consider this: In January 1981, when Reagan was sworn in and declared the federal budget to be “out of control,” our budgetÂ deficit had reached nearly $74 billion, and the national debt was about $930 billion. But by 1983, the deficit had reached $208 billion and by 1988, our national debt had grown to $2.6 trillion.Â More importantly, under Reagan, the US went from being the world’s largest international creditor to the world’s largest debtor nation.Â Don’t believe me?Â See thisÂ and this.
And for those Republicans griping about the $9 trillion Obama’s administration projects our debt to be, remind them $6 trillion of it is debt Obama inheireted from Bush administration policies enacted in the past 8 years.