Neither response is a winning political strategy.
It is pure political stupidity — and bad economic policy — for Democrats to treat the tax protests with derision or contempt.
Rather than mocking the aims of the tea parties, Democrats should follow the lead of presidential candidate Barack Obama, who promised to â€œprovide a tax cut for working familiesâ€ and â€œrestore fairness to the tax code and provide 95 percent of working Americans the tax relief they need.â€
Obama also promised to provide tax relief for small businesses and startups byÂ eliminating â€œall capital gains taxes on startup and small businesses to encourage innovation and job creation.â€
What Obama recognized â€“ and Democrats already seem to have forgotten â€“ is that working families are in fact being over-taxed while the super rich have gotten a free ride â€“ and that voters will cast their ballots for the party and the candidates who they believe will create a fairer tax code and reduce their tax burden.
And while it is certainly legitimate to point out that the anti-tax tea parties are being manipulated and guided by right-wing groups and talk-show hosts whose agendas are not the same as working and middle class voters, this point is devoid of political impact unless it is accompanied by a commitment to do a better job than these groups of protecting working class and middle class economic interests.
For too long, Democrats â€“ especially in California â€“ have allowed Republicans to dominate and set the terms of the tax debate.
As a result, Democrats have allowed Republicans to paint them as the party of higher taxes â€“ and have allowed the super rich to pretend to defend the economic interests of working families and the middle class while in fact shifting the costs of government to those who are least able to afford it.
Instead of responding to the tax protests with mockery and contempt, Democrats need to insist on talking about the kinds of taxes that the government imposes and who pays them.
We should insist that all taxes be progressive and focused on overturning the Republicanâ€™s outrageous favoritism of the super rich.
Especially in the midst of the current recession, we should oppose any increases whatsoever in regressive taxes â€“ such as the sales tax, the automobile tax, and the gasoline tax â€“ that disproportionately hit working and middle class families, unless and until the state and federal tax code is revised to require that the super rich pay their fair share.
Of course these tax protest “tea parties” are a Republican sham — the Republican anti-tax activists not interested in reducing the tax burden on the middle class and working families, but in keeping the Bush tax breaks for the rich — but that does not mean that the underlying middle class protest — even rage — at their tax burden should be ridiculed. On the contrary, it means that the Democrats should insist on seizing the debate and turning it against the Republicans — as Obama did.
Democrats can win the tax debate â€“ if they take the tax protest “tea parties” seriously.