<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Chelsea doesn&#8217;t have to answer that question&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/27/chelsea-doesnt-have-to-answer-that-question/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/27/chelsea-doesnt-have-to-answer-that-question/</link>
	<description>Challenging Orange County&#039;s right-wing noise machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 22:22:25 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Northcountystorm</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/27/chelsea-doesnt-have-to-answer-that-question/comment-page-1/#comment-16095</link>
		<dc:creator>Northcountystorm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 19:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/27/chelsea-doesnt-have-to-answer-that-question/#comment-16095</guid>
		<description>Heather, Now this is a nice post. I guess you read Captain Chris&#039; and Gatekeeper Gila&#039;s memo.  Seriously, I agree with your take.

Now there are some that would suggest that just by raising the subject you might be trying to give the underlying issue legs. Kind of like if Sean did a post on Obama and Rezco and opined that it was unfair to impugn Obama&#039;s ethics simply because of teh relationship Obama had with Rezco. But I don&#039;t think thats what you did. I think you were trying to be fair and I think you suceeded. Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heather, Now this is a nice post. I guess you read Captain Chris&#8217; and Gatekeeper Gila&#8217;s memo.  Seriously, I agree with your take.</p>
<p>Now there are some that would suggest that just by raising the subject you might be trying to give the underlying issue legs. Kind of like if Sean did a post on Obama and Rezco and opined that it was unfair to impugn Obama&#8217;s ethics simply because of teh relationship Obama had with Rezco. But I don&#8217;t think thats what you did. I think you were trying to be fair and I think you suceeded. Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
