WOW! Where do I start? I was looking yesterday at Orange Punch, only to find Steven Greenhut trying to compare OC GOP power broker Mike Schroeder to none other than Hillary Clinton. Yes, you heard me right… Schroeder = Clinton. Wait… HUH??!!
Greenhut tried to make this case by saying Schroder’s legal maneuvering against Debbie Cook and politicking against Republicans he doesn’t like is similar to Hillary’s “destructive” behavior… HUH?! When did this become “destructive”? How is this “destructive”? Why should this be labeled “destructive”? And where here can one find anything “destructive”?
Now don’t get me wrong, I like reading Greenhut over at Orange Punch. And occasionally, I may even agree with him. (Scary, isn’t it?) But when he tries to compare the rough & tumble tactics of Mike Schroeder with Hillary’s inspiring campaign that’s putting people first, I just don’t see it working.
Sorry, Mr. Greenhut.