<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faux Outrage, The Constitution, Privacy and The Blogosphere</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/</link>
	<description>Challenging Orange County&#039;s right-wing noise machine</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 17:20:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ed Velasquez</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15685</link>
		<dc:creator>Ed Velasquez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:44:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15685</guid>
		<description>Is anyone else amused (even mildly) that we keep using the term &quot;out&quot; when discussing the disclosure of Mike&#039;s identity?
In this context it&#039;s truly ironic.
And a sign of how far things have come that the term is in such widespread use.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is anyone else amused (even mildly) that we keep using the term &#8220;out&#8221; when discussing the disclosure of Mike&#8217;s identity?<br />
In this context it&#8217;s truly ironic.<br />
And a sign of how far things have come that the term is in such widespread use.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bladerunner</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15684</link>
		<dc:creator>Bladerunner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 07:37:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15684</guid>
		<description>I have no axe to grind with nor desire to attack the LOC. it&#039;s a great blog, I enjyo reading it especially during an election season.

I do believe that the decision to out Tardiff&#039;s Company was a mistake. I think Jubal has the better practice over at Red County. Delete the offensive comment(and this was offensive) and warn the commenter that next time they will be banned. 

Most anonymous commenters have an expectation of privacy as to their identity unless they have committed a crime. if you&#039;re going to out people, set up a standard  so people will know where the maginot Line really is</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have no axe to grind with nor desire to attack the LOC. it&#8217;s a great blog, I enjyo reading it especially during an election season.</p>
<p>I do believe that the decision to out Tardiff&#8217;s Company was a mistake. I think Jubal has the better practice over at Red County. Delete the offensive comment(and this was offensive) and warn the commenter that next time they will be banned. </p>
<p>Most anonymous commenters have an expectation of privacy as to their identity unless they have committed a crime. if you&#8217;re going to out people, set up a standard  so people will know where the maginot Line really is</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Chmielewski</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15681</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Chmielewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 03:54:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15681</guid>
		<description>Mike - I alluded to this on another string but I join Sean in commending your tone in civilized debate. We do count friends on the Right as well as the Left. While i strongly disagree with your position on gay marriage, I believe you established your belief and ability to debate</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike &#8211; I alluded to this on another string but I join Sean in commending your tone in civilized debate. We do count friends on the Right as well as the Left. While i strongly disagree with your position on gay marriage, I believe you established your belief and ability to debate</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean H. Mill</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15676</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean H. Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 02:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15676</guid>
		<description>Mike,

I want to commend you for standing up and apologizing.  That is the mark of a true gentleman and I have much respect for you.  I would hope that everyone would accept your apology and move on.

I also respect that you stand by your principles, though I strongly disagree with your position.  I do believe that you have a right to your beliefs and that you should not be condemned for them.

Other than the comments which you apologized for you have always conducted yourself with respect and dignity.  Though you disagree with folks you never come across as disagreeable.  I wish I could say the same about myself.

Thank you for standing up and taking responsibility.  As far as I am concerned that incident is closed and I hope others here do to.  We must now focus on making our community a better place for all.  I know that you will be a leader in that effort.

Believe when I say this Mike, you have my total respect.  I hope this whole incident doesn&#039;t prevent us from working together on making Santa Ana a better place.

Thank you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mike,</p>
<p>I want to commend you for standing up and apologizing.  That is the mark of a true gentleman and I have much respect for you.  I would hope that everyone would accept your apology and move on.</p>
<p>I also respect that you stand by your principles, though I strongly disagree with your position.  I do believe that you have a right to your beliefs and that you should not be condemned for them.</p>
<p>Other than the comments which you apologized for you have always conducted yourself with respect and dignity.  Though you disagree with folks you never come across as disagreeable.  I wish I could say the same about myself.</p>
<p>Thank you for standing up and taking responsibility.  As far as I am concerned that incident is closed and I hope others here do to.  We must now focus on making our community a better place for all.  I know that you will be a leader in that effort.</p>
<p>Believe when I say this Mike, you have my total respect.  I hope this whole incident doesn&#8217;t prevent us from working together on making Santa Ana a better place.</p>
<p>Thank you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Tardif</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15657</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Tardif</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15657</guid>
		<description>Sean Mill said:  (Mike) ... You apologized and I believe your sincerity. The apology was pretty Munozesque however, by only apologizing if you offended anyone.

Mike Tardif said:  ...  - ouch that smarts. I am going to have to think about that.

Sean,

You are correct in pointing out that my apology was weak.

In my original post I referred to deviant behaviors which are illegal and suggested that by allowing gays full marriage rights that the gay community would be leading society toward the path of those deviant behaviors.

I want to fully apologize to the gay community for making those hurtful references.  Those were rude and uncalled for statements, call them bigoted if you will.

I do however reserve my right to reasoned belief that allowing gays to marry will not lead to a beneficial outcome for society.

I know that this further apology will not satisfy everyone.  However, I do sincerely regret my original post for the hurt it has caused.

Regards,

Mike Tardif</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean Mill said:  (Mike) &#8230; You apologized and I believe your sincerity. The apology was pretty Munozesque however, by only apologizing if you offended anyone.</p>
<p>Mike Tardif said:  &#8230;  &#8211; ouch that smarts. I am going to have to think about that.</p>
<p>Sean,</p>
<p>You are correct in pointing out that my apology was weak.</p>
<p>In my original post I referred to deviant behaviors which are illegal and suggested that by allowing gays full marriage rights that the gay community would be leading society toward the path of those deviant behaviors.</p>
<p>I want to fully apologize to the gay community for making those hurtful references.  Those were rude and uncalled for statements, call them bigoted if you will.</p>
<p>I do however reserve my right to reasoned belief that allowing gays to marry will not lead to a beneficial outcome for society.</p>
<p>I know that this further apology will not satisfy everyone.  However, I do sincerely regret my original post for the hurt it has caused.</p>
<p>Regards,</p>
<p>Mike Tardif</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Chmielewski</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15656</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Chmielewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15656</guid>
		<description>Matt -- I have said before, sarcasm doesn&#039;t always translate well. I was trying to be funny and sarcastic and failed at both.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Matt &#8212; I have said before, sarcasm doesn&#8217;t always translate well. I was trying to be funny and sarcastic and failed at both.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jubal</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15614</link>
		<dc:creator>Jubal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 05:04:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15614</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;â€œIâ€™m not going to tell the LiberalOC.com folks how to run their blog.â€
and then you doâ€¦ non-sequitur, no?&lt;/i&gt;

No. I&#039;m sure you think I contradicted myself, but even if that were true -- which I dispute -- it wasn&#039;t a &lt;i&gt;non sequitur&lt;/i&gt;. ;)

I was merely giving my personal opinion and sharing from my experience running a political blog that allows unmoderated anon commenting. You guys can run this place how you wish. it was advice from a peer offered in a spirit of respect.

&lt;i&gt;â€œIn my experience, simple, known and enforced rules of conduct are the best means of ensuring commenters donâ€™t veer off into proscribed territory.â€

AndI donâ€™t believe we tell you how to run yours. And I donâ€™t see rules of engagement on your site either. &lt;/i&gt;

There&#039;&#039;s no persistently posted rules. However, I&#039;m pretty vigilant about policing the comments to the point where I am regularly and wrongly accused of censoring opinions with which I don&#039;t agree. As part of that, I am frequently re-stating the rules of the comments section, and over the years readers have become familiar with what those rules are. Plus, I think new commenters tend to intuitively figure out the rules by reading existing commenters.

Again, advice offered from a peer in a spirit of respect. Try taking it that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>â€œIâ€™m not going to tell the LiberalOC.com folks how to run their blog.â€<br />
and then you doâ€¦ non-sequitur, no?</i></p>
<p>No. I&#8217;m sure you think I contradicted myself, but even if that were true &#8212; which I dispute &#8212; it wasn&#8217;t a <i>non sequitur</i>. <img src='http://www.theliberaloc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>I was merely giving my personal opinion and sharing from my experience running a political blog that allows unmoderated anon commenting. You guys can run this place how you wish. it was advice from a peer offered in a spirit of respect.</p>
<p><i>â€œIn my experience, simple, known and enforced rules of conduct are the best means of ensuring commenters donâ€™t veer off into proscribed territory.â€</p>
<p>AndI donâ€™t believe we tell you how to run yours. And I donâ€™t see rules of engagement on your site either. </i></p>
<p>There&#8217;&#8217;s no persistently posted rules. However, I&#8217;m pretty vigilant about policing the comments to the point where I am regularly and wrongly accused of censoring opinions with which I don&#8217;t agree. As part of that, I am frequently re-stating the rules of the comments section, and over the years readers have become familiar with what those rules are. Plus, I think new commenters tend to intuitively figure out the rules by reading existing commenters.</p>
<p>Again, advice offered from a peer in a spirit of respect. Try taking it that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jubal</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15612</link>
		<dc:creator>Jubal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:51:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15612</guid>
		<description>just...asking:

&lt;i&gt;Most of us know there are fairly simple ways to dig on ipâ€™s to find out some very accurate data. Anyone on a computer should know that his/her activities can be traced&lt;/i&gt;

Maybe you do, but my ability doesn&#039;t extend beyond the ARIS WHOIS Database Search. And when one pops an IP into it, 90% of the time it reveals the ISP of that IP user, and that&#039;s it.

&lt;i&gt;You all however have your times when rules are not applied consistanly.&lt;/i&gt;

No, I&#039;m not 100% consistent, but I try to get as close as I can

&lt;/i&gt;When some bloggers post under different names youâ€™ve outed those.&lt;/i&gt;

I&#039;ve never revealed who they are. Sometimes -- usually when someone is antagonizing me or someone else while using a different name for every comment -- I&#039;ll point out that the various names are actually one person. But I never say who they are.

&lt;i&gt;Youâ€™ve even thrown names, employers and job roles out while trying to name bloggers.&lt;/i&gt;

When?

&lt;i&gt;Youâ€™ve pointed out when Art has come into OCBlog under different names&lt;/i&gt;

Nope. Never have. For one thing, Art doesn&#039;t comment on OC Blog under different names. There are some anon Trannies who keep making that allegation -- and I have corrected that misperception for them.

Otherwise, I agree with your comment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>just&#8230;asking:</p>
<p><i>Most of us know there are fairly simple ways to dig on ipâ€™s to find out some very accurate data. Anyone on a computer should know that his/her activities can be traced</i></p>
<p>Maybe you do, but my ability doesn&#8217;t extend beyond the ARIS WHOIS Database Search. And when one pops an IP into it, 90% of the time it reveals the ISP of that IP user, and that&#8217;s it.</p>
<p><i>You all however have your times when rules are not applied consistanly.</i></p>
<p>No, I&#8217;m not 100% consistent, but I try to get as close as I can</p>
<p>When some bloggers post under different names youâ€™ve outed those.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve never revealed who they are. Sometimes &#8212; usually when someone is antagonizing me or someone else while using a different name for every comment &#8212; I&#8217;ll point out that the various names are actually one person. But I never say who they are.</p>
<p><i>Youâ€™ve even thrown names, employers and job roles out while trying to name bloggers.</i></p>
<p>When?</p>
<p><i>Youâ€™ve pointed out when Art has come into OCBlog under different names</i></p>
<p>Nope. Never have. For one thing, Art doesn&#8217;t comment on OC Blog under different names. There are some anon Trannies who keep making that allegation &#8212; and I have corrected that misperception for them.</p>
<p>Otherwise, I agree with your comment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean H. Mill</title>
		<link>http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/comment-page-1/#comment-15611</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean H. Mill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Mar 2008 04:49:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theliberaloc.com/2008/03/11/faux-outrage-the-constitution-privacy-and-the-blogosphere/#comment-15611</guid>
		<description>I hear you Ed, but when people attack Chris, myself and this blog I must stand my ground.  Chris did what he thought was right and I agree with him 100%.  I would hope that all of our bloggers would come to Chris&#039; and the blogs defense when attacked in the manner in which they were.

This will all die down soon enough.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hear you Ed, but when people attack Chris, myself and this blog I must stand my ground.  Chris did what he thought was right and I agree with him 100%.  I would hope that all of our bloggers would come to Chris&#8217; and the blogs defense when attacked in the manner in which they were.</p>
<p>This will all die down soon enough.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
