Bush Vetos Health Insurance for Children

and drives more nails in the GOP coffin for 2008. 

HT the New York Times and AP:

Bush Vetoes Child Health Plan

Published: October 3, 2007

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Bush cast a quiet veto Wednesday against a politically attractive expansion of children’s health insurance, triggering a struggle with the Democratic-controlled Congress certain to reverberate into the 2008 elections.

”Congress will fight hard to override President Bush’s heartless veto,” vowed Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.

Republican leaders expressed confidence they have enough votes to make the veto stick in the House, and not a single senior Democrat disputed them. A two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress is required to override a veto.

Bush vetoed the bill in private, absent the television cameras and other media coverage that normally attend even routine presidential actions. The measure called for adding an estimated four million mostly lower-income children to a program that currently covers 6.6 million. Funds for the expansion would come from higher tobacco taxes, including a 61-cent increase on a pack of cigarettes.

”Poor kids first,” Bush said later in explaining his decision, reflecting a concern that some of the bill’s benefits would go to families at higher incomes. ”Secondly, I believe in private medicine, not the federal government running the health care system,” he added in remarks to an audience in Lancaster, Pa.

The president said he is willing to compromise with Congress ”if they need a little more money in the bill to help us meet the objective of getting help for poor children.”

It was the fourth veto of Bush’s presidency, at a time his popularity is low, the legislation popular enough to draw support from dozens of GOP lawmakers, and an override certain to seal his lame-duck status.

Democratic leaders scheduled the showdown for Oct. 18 to allow two weeks for pressure to build on Republicans. A union-led organization said it would spend more than $3 million trying to influence the outcome. ”It’s going to be a hard vote for Republicans,” promised Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif.

Criticism of the veto was instantaneous, from every quarter of the Democratic political firmament.

Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, a presidential hopeful, called it unconscionable, party chairman Howard Dean labeled it appalling, and Pelosi said, ”It’s very sad that the president has chosen to veto a bill that would provide health care for ten million American children for the next five years.”

Republicans said none of the criticism would matter. ”I’m confident that the more time we have to explain the veto, the more people will be with their position,’ said Rep. Roy Blunt of Missouri, second-ranking GOP leader in the House.

Longer term, Republicans said their goal was to sustain the veto and force Democrats into negotiations on a compromise that GOP lawmakers could embrace.

”Democrats now face an important choice: Either work with Republicans to renew this program or continue to play politics on the backs of our nation’s children,” said Rep. John Boehner of Ohio, the House Republican leader.

He and other Republicans said Democratic plans to delay an override vote revealed an eagerness to score political points.

Democrats, sensing a political advantage, said they were in no mood to compromise. Several officials, speaking on condition of anonymity because they were discussing strategy, said Pelosi and Reid seemed set on sending Bush successor bills that are nearly identical with the one he just vetoed. The goal would be to force him — and his congressional allies — to repeatedly expose themselves to criticism that they were denying health care for kids.

Both sides took comfort from polling data as they settled in for their struggle.

Democracy Corps said its poll showed the public sides with Democrats by a margin of 60-35. The veto battle ”gives Democrats a large advantage with independents, as well as mobilizing Democratic supporters. Indeed, the president has not won over Republican voters on this issue,” said an accompanying memo.

House Republicans quietly distributed a survey by David Winston, who is close to Boehner, that came to a different conclusion. It said critics of the legislation can win the public debate if they say they favor ”covering uninsured children without expanding government coverage to adults, illegal immigrants and those who already have insurance….” A copy of the poll was obtained by The Associated Press.

Numerous polls have shown health insurance to be an important issue with the public, and Democrats have made expansion of the children’s health program a priority since taking control of Congress in January.

Health care also has figured prominently in the campaign for the White House, with presidential hopefuls in both parties sketching plans to reduce the swelling population of the uninsured, now estimated by the Census Bureau to number 47 million.

There was no doubting the bill’s political appeal.

Eighteen Republicans in the Senate supported the measure when it passed, including four who face difficult challenges next year. In the House, 45 GOP lawmakers defected.

There were 265 votes in all for the measure when it passed last month. Supporters need to pick up 25 more votes to override the veto.

Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland said a few of the eight Democrats who originally voted no — principally because of the tax increase — would switch sides, and one or two more votes were available from a small group that was absent on the earlier vote.

But 151 Republicans opposed the bill when it passed, enough to sustain the veto, and absent numerous switches, Bush’s veto seemed secure.

”We got what we wanted,” said Rep. Tom Cole of Oklahoma, chairman of the GOP campaign committee and an opponent of the bill.

”Once they vote it’s pretty hard to change,” conceded Sen. Orrin Hatch, a Utah Republican who supported the legislation and said repeatedly he hoped Bush would sign it.

Some Republicans joined in the criticism of Bush.

”I believe this is an irresponsible use of the veto pen,” said Sen. Gordon Smith, an Oregon Republican facing a difficult re-election next year.

The original Senate vote was 67-29, enough to override. But the House votes first, and if Bush’s allies sustain his veto there, the bill dies.


  6 comments for “Bush Vetos Health Insurance for Children

  1. Paul Lucas
    October 3, 2007 at 7:09 pm

    How do you expect us to pay for the services of Blackwater in Iraq if we go and do something as crazy as give every kid in America health insurance if they do not have any? Come on people!

  2. October 3, 2007 at 7:41 pm

    A broken clock is right twice a day. If this bill had been passed by a GOP Congress like the stupid Prescription Drug Bill a few years ago, he would have signed it in a heartbeat. Nice to actually see him veto something for a change.

  3. Dan Chmielewski
    October 3, 2007 at 9:03 pm

    Allan — this bill has broad GOP support in the Senate. Good luck on elections in 2008 on this veto. Ask yoru sister what she thinks about it (note to readers: Allan has a progressive sister in the Bay area recovering from cancer; last checkup, she was cancer-free and we at the LiberalOC are pretty damn glad about that!

  4. Northcountystorm
    October 3, 2007 at 10:10 pm

    cowardly–done in the shadows like other dirty deeds.

    After 6 years of spending like a drunken sailor Bush finally decides to sober up at the expense of kids.

    The shame…..

  5. October 4, 2007 at 6:40 am

    Thanks for the plug about my sister Dan. We’re very happy she is on the road to recovery. She is indeed a card carrying liberal, LOL. She actually is taking a hard look at Ron Paul right now.

  6. October 4, 2007 at 1:40 pm

    If you want to send an email to your representative on this issue, visit http://www.democrats.org/FightForKids

Comments are closed.