Register: Pardon Libby

Today’s OC Register cals for the pardon of Dick Cheney’s former chief of staff saying there was no underlying crime.

The crime was the blown cover of a covert CIA operative who’s undercover status is well documented and well established.  Libby knew there was an investigation and obstructed the progress of the investigation. 

If Clinton could be impeached for perjruy by making false statements in a civil deposition on the Paula Jones case, then why can’t Libby be charged with obstructing justice in outing Valerie Plame, who was working on counter intelligence areas of Iran’s nuclear program?

Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald states — Libby knew there was an investigation going on when he gave his sworn statements; he knew what the investigation was about; he had the benefit of attorneys; he was an experienced attorney himself; and he had other options than the false statements he made. In an excellent and concise presentation, Fitzgerald argued that the sentencing should reflect two things: 1) that the truth matters, in an investigation; and 2) that a person’s station in life does not matter.

Reflecting prosecution and defense arguments, the judge acknowledged Libby’s position in government. Walton also said, however, that there is a “heightened responsibility” for a well-placed government official, when he is notified that there is an investigation. Walton said, “I just can’t buy in on that being good social policy” that a government official convicted of obstruction should get off. “Knowingly obstructing the process,” Walton said, “I think there’s a price to pay. If you know there’s an investigation going on, you come forward, you tell the truth.”

Libby should go to jail.

An Update: from the New York Times —

The jail sentence and fine imposed on Scooter Libby, the former chief of staff for Vice President Dick Cheney, are an appropriate — indeed necessary — punishment for his repeated lies to a grand jury and to F.B.I. agents investigating a possible smear campaign orchestrated by the White House. Although Mr. Libby plans to appeal, as he has every legal right to, the judge ought to send him to jail now as a lesson that such efforts to frustrate justice will not be tolerated.

Mr. Libby was convicted in March for lying about his role in revealing the identity of Valerie Plame Wilson, a C.I.A. officer, as part of a campaign to discredit her husband, Joseph Wilson. He was a diplomat whose inquiries abroad had shot holes through a key premise for the war in Iraq, that Saddam Hussein had recently tried to buy uranium from Niger for a secret nuclear weapons program. Although Mr. Libby’s supporters make much of the fact that no one was ever indicted for leaking Ms. Wilson’s name, that should not obscure the fact that Mr. Libby did his best to derail efforts to find out who did it and why.

Federal District Judge Reggie Walton sentenced Mr. Libby to two and a half years in prison and fined him $250,000 based on “overwhelming evidence” of Mr. Libby’s guilt on four counts, including obstruction of justice, perjury and giving false statements. The jail term was at the low end of what the prosecutor had recommended but much harsher than the probation sought by Mr. Libby’s attorneys.

Although Libby partisans sometimes suggest that he is being railroaded because of anger over his zeal in promoting the disastrous war in Iraq, that is hardly the case here. Judge Walton, who was appointed to the federal bench by the current President Bush, is simply known for a tough-on-crime attitude that transcends politics.

Mr. Libby’s attorneys are asking that he be allowed to remain free while his appeal goes forward, but there is no good reason for Judge Walton to grant such undeserved leniency. Some analysts suggest that the Libby strategy is to run out the clock with an appeal and then count on a last-minute pardon from President Bush as he leaves office. At a time when high administration officials routinely dissemble and claim lapses of memory, immediate jail time for Mr. Libby, a convicted felon, is the best way to send a message that obstruction of justice will be severely punished.

  3 comments for “Register: Pardon Libby

  1. June 6, 2007 at 11:31 am

    Can we find out if Todd Spitzer agrees with this position? Then they can be on the same side again.

    That would be PRO CRIMINAL of course.

  2. June 6, 2007 at 11:38 am

    Underlying Crime?

    Perjury does not require an underlying crime to be proven for conviction. But just for the sake of clearing tha air, the act of perjury in this instance abstruicted justice.

    Last I checked, that was a crime.

  3. Aunt Millie
    June 6, 2007 at 4:40 pm

    These modern Washington Republicans appear to have some defining characteristics.

    First, they have such incredibly bad memories to the point where any attempt to ascertain the truth is an alien concept.

    Second, they are just as bad at actually governing as they are good at politics.

    Third, they hate it when one of them has to take responsibility for his actions
    It’s terrifying for them when political criminals or white collar criminals start being forced to testify under oath.

    They thought they had the system fixed where they would have a permanent majority, with control of executive, judicial and legislative branches, but the American people pushed back, and now they are scrambling desperately to rally public opinion for their poor criminals.

    Republicans are Soft on Republican Crime.because they knew,

    It’s not a crime as long as you can get away with it.

Comments are closed.