Is Tan going to follow the Republican M.O.?

So, Tan blames his female staffer?

Ok, now I am waiting for the following:

1) Tan states he is an alcoholic.
2) Tan checks into rehab.
3) Tan reveals that he was molested by a priest or a female staffer.
4) Tan blames the influence of a gay member of the Democratic Party when he ran as a Democrat.
5) Tan reveals he is gay.

That’s the M.O., right? A bunch of lame-ass excuses with a path to marginalize the gay population.

Wasn’t it stated on this blog months ago that Tan was a f#cked up, nefarious racist?
Weren’t there many responses to this blog that these claims were not true?
So now what?

So, pathetic on many levels.

  9 comments for “Is Tan going to follow the Republican M.O.?

  1. October 20, 2006 at 9:23 am

    Please no political clichés – Tan ran as a Democrat just a couple years ago. Lame excuses from politicians are not restricted to any one political party.

  2. Anonymous
    October 20, 2006 at 9:36 am

    tan is a communist!! he should be sent back to vietnam!!

  3. October 20, 2006 at 10:24 am

    If Tan gives the lame-ass “gay excuse”, I will feel very tempted to slap the man! That would be so ridiculously stupid and disgustingly offensive…

    Oh wait, that’s right! The ridiculously stupid anddisgustingly offensive are Tan’s specialties!

    Oh, and I’ve been noticing how soem of Tan’s right-wing friends are already blaming this over his “recessive Democrat gene”…
    Gimme a break!

    The GOP welcomed him with open arms after the Democratic PRIMARY VOTERS in the 46th CD overwhelmingly rejected him…
    Sorry, GOPers, but you wanted him…
    And now, you’ve got him!

    Maybe the GOP should have taken a cue from us and decided NOT TO GO WITH TAN (to jail)!

  4. Anonymous
    October 20, 2006 at 11:07 am

    I can’t really blame Tan for sending out such letters (if he did) because there were so many illegal votes in the past. That’s how Loretta Sanchez won her seat. She does not deserve to be a Congresswoman because she is a selfish manipulative pig. Don’t you all agree?

  5. October 20, 2006 at 11:31 am

    Anon 11:07

    I wont get into your hateful rhetoric, but “so many illegals vote…”

    Yeah thats it. Americans wont vote when they are registered, but illegal Mexican immigrants vote all the time! That is why they come here.. to vote!

    That is the stupidest thing I have ever heard

  6. October 20, 2006 at 12:34 pm

    He could also go the route of Bush, Weldon, and the Foley defenders and say the leaking of this info is an evil Democratic plot to throw the election!

  7. October 20, 2006 at 12:58 pm

    “I can’t really blame Tan for sending out such letters (if he did) because there were so many illegal votes in the past.”

    Anon 11:07/Tan Troll:


    And your hero Tan was CAUGHT RED-HANDED in this illegal mailer!

    Perhaps you are willing to go with Tan to jail…
    But no one else is! Even the OC GOP has abandoned him…

    But I guess you Tan Trolls will never abandon him…
    I guess you are the only ones who are willing to go with Tan to jail.

  8. October 20, 2006 at 12:59 pm

    Tan’s M.O. sure doesn’t speak well to his housekeeping skills. By default he is claiming incompetence! His ability to maintain HIS books and business oversight ability is disgraceful. His claim, that some “female” staffer spent like $75,000 of his cash on hand without his direct approval… bullsh!t
    Yeah, I’m so sure that’s the way it happened.

    Two things leap to my mind since these local politics usally stay local,

    1. Isn’t this the same kind of thing that Republicans did in Ohio and Florida? I’m not so sure it’s coincidental.

    Could be that’s why OC Republicans are feining utter disgustion by the audaciousness of the act.
    There’s a Rovian element here.

    2. Tan’s claim of no oversight of his staffs spending is parallel to Republican’s participation in the great American system of checks and balances.

  9. Anonymous
    October 21, 2006 at 8:42 am

    Anon 11:07am, right on. Do you notice how the truth hurts these folks?

Comments are closed.