This back-handed commentary on the Bush foreign policy of spreading democracy throughout the world caught my eye yesterday.
Why isn’t Bush invading Thailand?
By John Seiler at the OC RegisterÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s Orange Punch Blog
President Bush insists that he has the right, and duty, to advance democracy by force. Thailand’s military just threw out its elected prime minister, canceling democracy. So why isn’t Bush invading Thailand to restore Democracy?
Then, after that, he could invade Vietnam, Laos, Red China, etc. to advance Democracy even more.Is he getting soft on tyranny?